<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can&#8217;t go back to square one.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebesthorsesense.com/2009/09/06/you-cant-go-back-to-square-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebesthorsesense.com/2009/09/06/you-cant-go-back-to-square-one/</link>
	<description>What I Need for the Future I Learned in the Pasture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:53:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Berman</title>
		<link>http://thebesthorsesense.com/2009/09/06/you-cant-go-back-to-square-one/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Berman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebesthorsesense.com/?p=511#comment-302</guid>
		<description>I think you and Seth are both right. He was working from with the context of the euphemism, that going back to square one was indeed even with the realm of reasonable possibility. You are laying out the groundwork that assuming square one is possible is it the same place you left, which is also a valid question to ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you and Seth are both right. He was working from with the context of the euphemism, that going back to square one was indeed even with the realm of reasonable possibility. You are laying out the groundwork that assuming square one is possible is it the same place you left, which is also a valid question to ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
